Opel Combo 2001 vs Renault Scenic 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.7 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 65 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 130 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18.5 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Renault Scenic is a more dynamic driving. Opel Combo engine produces 55 HP less power than Renault Scenic, whereas torque is 170 NM less than Renault Scenic. Due to the lower power, Opel Combo reaches 100 km/h speed 6.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 5.8 | |
|
The Opel Combo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Combo consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic, which means that by driving the Opel Combo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| Renault Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.62 m | |
| Opel Combo is 6 cm longer than the Renault Scenic, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Combo is 18 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1840 litres | |
|
Opel Combo has more luggage capacity. Opel Combo has 25 litres more trunk space than the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Combo is 0.5 metres more than that of the Renault Scenic, which means Opel Combo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`990 | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.5/10 | 5.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Combo has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |