Opel Combo 2001 vs Renault Scenic 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.7 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 65 HP | 85 HP | |
| Torque: | 130 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18.5 seconds | 14.6 seconds | |
|
Renault Scenic is a more dynamic driving. Opel Combo engine produces 20 HP less power than Renault Scenic, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Renault Scenic. Due to the lower power, Opel Combo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 5.1 | |
|
The Renault Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Combo consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Combo could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| Renault Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.62 m | |
| Opel Combo is 6 cm longer than the Renault Scenic, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Combo is 18 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 406 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1840 litres | |
|
Opel Combo has more luggage capacity. Opel Combo has 49 litres more trunk space than the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Combo is 0.5 metres more than that of the Renault Scenic, which means Opel Combo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`990 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.5/10 | 6.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Combo has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |