Opel Combo 2001 vs Renault Kangoo 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.7 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 65 HP | 80 HP | |
| Torque: | 130 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18.5 seconds | 14.1 seconds | |
|
Renault Kangoo is a more dynamic driving. Opel Combo engine produces 15 HP less power than Renault Kangoo, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Renault Kangoo. Due to the lower power, Opel Combo reaches 100 km/h speed 4.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 5.7 | |
|
The Opel Combo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Combo consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kangoo, which means that by driving the Opel Combo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| Opel Combo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.83 m | |
|
Opel Combo is larger, but slightly lower. Opel Combo is 32 cm longer than the Renault Kangoo, 3 cm wider, while the height of Opel Combo is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 650 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2600 litres | |
|
Renault Kangoo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Opel Combo has 195 litres less trunk space than the Renault Kangoo. This could mean that the Opel Combo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Combo is 0.4 metres more than that of the Renault Kangoo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`990 | 1`660 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Combo has
|
Renault Kangoo has
| |