Opel Combo 2001 vs Nissan Almera Tino 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.7 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 65 HP | 114 HP | |
| Torque: | 130 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18.5 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Nissan Almera Tino is a more dynamic driving. Opel Combo engine produces 49 HP less power than Nissan Almera Tino, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Nissan Almera Tino. Due to the lower power, Opel Combo reaches 100 km/h speed 6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 6.4 | |
|
The Opel Combo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Combo consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Almera Tino, which means that by driving the Opel Combo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.61 m | |
| Opel Combo is 6 cm longer than the Nissan Almera Tino, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Combo is 19 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1950 litres | |
| Opel Combo has 15 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Almera Tino. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Combo is 0.8 metres more than that of the Nissan Almera Tino, which means Opel Combo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`990 | 1`940 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Combo has
|
Nissan Almera Tino has
| |