Opel Combo 2001 vs Ford C-Max 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.7 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 65 HP | 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 130 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18.5 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Ford C-Max is a more dynamic driving. Opel Combo engine produces 44 HP less power than Ford C-Max, whereas torque is 110 NM less than Ford C-Max. Due to the lower power, Opel Combo reaches 100 km/h speed 7.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 4.9 | |
|
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Combo consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Combo could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| Ford C-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Opel Combo is smaller, but higher. Opel Combo is 1 cm shorter than the Ford C-Max, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Combo is 20 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1620 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Combo is 0.5 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max, which means Opel Combo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`990 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.5/10 | 7.6/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Combo has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |