Opel Combo 2001 vs Citroen Xsara Picasso 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.7 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 65 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 130 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18.5 seconds | 14.5 seconds | |
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso is a more dynamic driving. Opel Combo engine produces 25 HP less power than Citroen Xsara Picasso, whereas torque is 75 NM less than Citroen Xsara Picasso. Due to the lower power, Opel Combo reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 5.5 | |
| Opel Combo consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, which means that by driving the Opel Combo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
| Citroen Xsara Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.64 m | |
| Opel Combo is 4 cm longer than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Combo is 16 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 550 litres | |
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Opel Combo has 95 litres less trunk space than the Citroen Xsara Picasso. This could mean that the Opel Combo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Combo is 0.3 metres less than that of the Citroen Xsara Picasso. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`990 | 1`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.5/10 | 6.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Combo has
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
| |