Opel Combo 2001 vs Renault Kangoo 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 87 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 138 NM | 148 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
|
Renault Kangoo is a more dynamic driving. Opel Combo engine produces 8 HP less power than Renault Kangoo, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Renault Kangoo. Due to the lower power, Opel Combo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 8.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Combo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Combo consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kangoo, which means that by driving the Opel Combo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Combo consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kangoo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 710 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Opel Combo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Renault Kangoo 2003 1.6 engine: The Renault K4M 1.6 16V is one of the most durable and well-known engines in its class. It is simple, widely used, and generally not demanding, with many well-maintained examples reaching 400,000–500,000 km. The engine is not especially modern or economical by current standards, but it has a ... More about Renault Kangoo 2003 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.83 m | |
|
Opel Combo is larger, but slightly lower. Opel Combo is 32 cm longer than the Renault Kangoo, 3 cm wider, while the height of Opel Combo is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 2500 litres | |
|
Renault Kangoo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Opel Combo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Combo is 0.4 metres more than that of the Renault Kangoo. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`730 kg | 1`850 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Combo has
|
Renault Kangoo has
| |