Opel Combo 2001 vs Renault Kangoo 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 87 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 138 NM | 148 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Renault Kangoo is a more dynamic driving. Opel Combo engine produces 8 HP less power than Renault Kangoo, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Renault Kangoo. Due to the lower power, Opel Combo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 7.5 | |
| Opel Combo consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kangoo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Combo could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.83 m | |
|
Opel Combo is larger, but slightly lower. Opel Combo is 32 cm longer than the Renault Kangoo, 3 cm wider, while the height of Opel Combo is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 650 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2600 litres | |
|
Renault Kangoo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Opel Combo has 195 litres less trunk space than the Renault Kangoo. This could mean that the Opel Combo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Combo is 0.4 metres more than that of the Renault Kangoo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`730 | 1`645 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Combo has
|
Renault Kangoo has
| |