Opel Combo 2004 vs Renault Kangoo 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 97 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 140 NM | 148 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Renault Kangoo is a more dynamic driving. Opel Combo engine produces 2 HP more power than Renault Kangoo, but torque is 8 NM less than Renault Kangoo. Despite the higher power, Opel Combo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.04 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Opel Combo is larger, but slightly lower. Opel Combo is 28 cm longer than the Renault Kangoo, 2 cm wider, while the height of Opel Combo is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 650 litres | |
|
Renault Kangoo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Opel Combo has 195 litres less trunk space than the Renault Kangoo. This could mean that the Opel Combo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Combo is 0.8 metres more than that of the Renault Kangoo, which means Opel Combo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`900 | 1`150 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Renault Kangoo has
| |