Opel Combo 2004 vs Ford Tourneo 2010
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 97 HP | 90 HP | |
Torque: | 140 NM | 220 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 15.2 seconds | |
Opel Combo is more dynamic to drive. Opel Combo engine produces 7 HP more power than Ford Tourneo, but torque is 80 NM less than Ford Tourneo. Thanks to more power Opel Combo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 6.4 | |
The Ford Tourneo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Combo consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Tourneo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Combo could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
880 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
Ford Tourneo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.32 m | 4.57 m | |
Width: | 1.69 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.80 m | 1.98 m | |
Opel Combo is smaller. Opel Combo is 25 cm shorter than the Ford Tourneo, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Combo is 18 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Opel Combo is 0.7 metres less than that of the Ford Tourneo, which means Opel Combo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`900 | 2`330 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 2000 | 5600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Opel Combo has
|
Ford Tourneo has
| |