Opel Combo 2004 vs Renault Scenic 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 70 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
|
Renault Scenic is a more dynamic driving. Opel Combo engine produces 40 HP less power than Renault Scenic, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Renault Scenic. Due to the lower power, Opel Combo reaches 100 km/h speed 4.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Combo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Combo consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic, which means that by driving the Opel Combo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Combo consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 920 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Renault Scenic 2009 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Scenic 2009 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Opel Combo is smaller, but higher. Opel Combo is 2 cm shorter than the Renault Scenic, 16 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Combo is 16 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 437 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1837 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Opel Combo has 18 litres more trunk space than the Renault Scenic. The Renault Scenic may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Combo is 0.2 metres more than that of the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`815 | 1`944 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Combo has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |