Opel Combo 2004 vs Renault Kangoo 2008

 
Opel Combo
2004 - 2011
Renault Kangoo
2008 - 2013
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.2 Diesel1.5 Diesel

Performance

Power: 70 HP105 HP
Torque: 170 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 17 seconds13.2 seconds
Renault Kangoo is a more dynamic driving.
Opel Combo engine produces 35 HP less power than Renault Kangoo, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Renault Kangoo. Due to the lower power, Opel Combo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.15.7
Real fuel consumption: 5.6 l/100km6.6 l/100km
The Opel Combo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Opel Combo consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kangoo, which means that by driving the Opel Combo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Combo consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kangoo.
Fuel tank capacity: 52 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1010 km in combined cycle1050 km in combined cycle
1200 km on highway1130 km on highway
920 km with real consumption900 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.32 m4.21 m
Width: 1.69 m1.83 m
Height: 1.80 m1.80 m
Opel Combo is 11 cm longer than the Renault Kangoo, 14 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 455 litres438 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1977 litres
Opel Combo has 17 litres more trunk space than the Renault Kangoo.
Turning diameter: 11.2 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Combo is 0.2 metres more than that of the Renault Kangoo.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8151`982
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 24002800
Pros and Cons: Opel Combo has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Renault Kangoo has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv