Opel Combo 2004 vs Ford Tourneo 2010
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.2 Diesel | 1.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 70 HP | 90 HP | |
Torque: | 170 NM | 220 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17 seconds | 15.2 seconds | |
Ford Tourneo is a more dynamic driving. Opel Combo engine produces 20 HP less power than Ford Tourneo, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Ford Tourneo. Due to the lower power, Opel Combo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 6.4 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
The Opel Combo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Combo consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Tourneo, which means that by driving the Opel Combo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Combo consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Tourneo. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
1200 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
920 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
Opel Combo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.32 m | 4.57 m | |
Width: | 1.69 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.80 m | 1.98 m | |
Opel Combo is smaller. Opel Combo is 25 cm shorter than the Ford Tourneo, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Combo is 18 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Opel Combo is 0.7 metres less than that of the Ford Tourneo, which means Opel Combo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`815 | 2`330 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 2000 | 5600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Opel Combo has
|
Ford Tourneo has
| |