Opel Combo 2004 vs Ford C-Max 2003

 
Opel Combo
2004 - 2011
Ford C-Max
2003 - 2007
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.2 Diesel1.6 Diesel

Performance

Power: 70 HP109 HP
Torque: 170 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 17 seconds11.3 seconds
Ford C-Max is a more dynamic driving.
Opel Combo engine produces 39 HP less power than Ford C-Max, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Ford C-Max. Due to the lower power, Opel Combo reaches 100 km/h speed 5.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.14.9
Real fuel consumption: 5.6 l/100km5.7 l/100km
By specification Opel Combo consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Combo could require 30 litres more fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Opel Combo consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max.
Fuel tank capacity: 52 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1010 km in combined cycle1120 km in combined cycle
1200 km on highway1340 km on highway
920 km with real consumption960 km with real consumption
Ford C-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.32 m4.33 m
Width: 1.69 m1.82 m
Height: 1.80 m1.60 m
Opel Combo is smaller, but higher.
Opel Combo is 1 cm shorter than the Ford C-Max, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Combo is 20 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 455 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1620 litres
Turning diameter: 11.2 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Combo is 0.5 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max, which means Opel Combo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`815no data
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 22001600
Pros and Cons:
    Ford C-Max has
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv