Opel Combo 2004 vs Ford C-Max 2003
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.2 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 70 HP | 109 HP | |
Torque: | 170 NM | 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
Ford C-Max is a more dynamic driving. Opel Combo engine produces 39 HP less power than Ford C-Max, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Ford C-Max. Due to the lower power, Opel Combo reaches 100 km/h speed 5.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 4.9 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km | |
By specification Opel Combo consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Combo could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Opel Combo consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
1200 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
920 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
Ford C-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.32 m | 4.33 m | |
Width: | 1.69 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.80 m | 1.60 m | |
Opel Combo is smaller, but higher. Opel Combo is 1 cm shorter than the Ford C-Max, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Combo is 20 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1620 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Opel Combo is 0.5 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max, which means Opel Combo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`815 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 2000 | 1600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford C-Max has
| |