Opel Combo 2004 vs Ford C-Max 2007
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.2 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 70 HP | 90 HP | |
Torque: | 170 NM | 215 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
Ford C-Max is a more dynamic driving. Opel Combo engine produces 20 HP less power than Ford C-Max, whereas torque is 45 NM less than Ford C-Max. Due to the lower power, Opel Combo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 4.8 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Combo consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Combo could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
920 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
Ford C-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.32 m | 4.33 m | |
Width: | 1.69 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.80 m | 1.60 m | |
Opel Combo is smaller, but higher. Opel Combo is 1 cm shorter than the Ford C-Max, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Combo is 20 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 550 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1620 litres | |
Ford C-Max has more luggage space. Opel Combo has 95 litres less trunk space than the Ford C-Max. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Opel Combo is 0.5 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max, which means Opel Combo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`815 | 1`920 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 2000 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Opel Combo has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |