Opel Combo 2004 vs Ford C-Max 2007

 
Opel Combo
2004 - 2011
Ford C-Max
2007 - 2010
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.2 Diesel1.6 Diesel

Performance

Power: 70 HP90 HP
Torque: 170 NM215 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 17 seconds13.1 seconds
Ford C-Max is a more dynamic driving.
Opel Combo engine produces 20 HP less power than Ford C-Max, whereas torque is 45 NM less than Ford C-Max. Due to the lower power, Opel Combo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.14.8
Real fuel consumption: 5.6 l/100km5.6 l/100km
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Opel Combo consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Combo could require 45 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 52 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1010 km in combined cycle1140 km in combined cycle
920 km with real consumption980 km with real consumption
Ford C-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.32 m4.33 m
Width: 1.69 m1.82 m
Height: 1.80 m1.60 m
Opel Combo is smaller, but higher.
Opel Combo is 1 cm shorter than the Ford C-Max, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Combo is 20 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 455 litres550 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1620 litres
Ford C-Max has more luggage space.
Opel Combo has 95 litres less trunk space than the Ford C-Max.
Turning diameter: 11.2 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Combo is 0.5 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max, which means Opel Combo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8151`920
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 24002800
Pros and Cons: Opel Combo has
  • lower price
Ford C-Max has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv