Opel Combo 2004 vs Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004

 
Opel Combo
2004 - 2011
Citroen Xsara Picasso
2004 - 2006
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.2 Diesel1.6 Diesel

Performance

Power: 70 HP110 HP
Torque: 170 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 17 seconds12.4 seconds
Citroen Xsara Picasso is a more dynamic driving.
Opel Combo engine produces 40 HP less power than Citroen Xsara Picasso, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Citroen Xsara Picasso. Due to the lower power, Opel Combo reaches 100 km/h speed 4.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.14.9
Real fuel consumption: 5.6 l/100km6.1 l/100km
The Opel Combo is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise.
By specification Opel Combo consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Combo could require 30 litres more fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Opel Combo consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara Picasso.
Fuel tank capacity: 52 litres54 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1010 km in combined cycle1100 km in combined cycle
1200 km on highway1310 km on highway
920 km with real consumption880 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.32 m4.28 m
Width: 1.69 m1.75 m
Height: 1.80 m1.64 m
Opel Combo is 4 cm longer than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Combo is 16 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 455 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11.2 meters11.5 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Combo is 0.3 metres less than that of the Citroen Xsara Picasso.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8151`300
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): 22002200
Pros and Cons:
    Citroen Xsara Picasso has
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv