Opel Combo 2004 vs Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.2 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 70 HP | 110 HP | |
Torque: | 170 NM | 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
Citroen Xsara Picasso is a more dynamic driving. Opel Combo engine produces 40 HP less power than Citroen Xsara Picasso, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Citroen Xsara Picasso. Due to the lower power, Opel Combo reaches 100 km/h speed 4.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 4.9 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
The Opel Combo is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Opel Combo consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Combo could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Opel Combo consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara Picasso. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 54 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1100 km in combined cycle | |
1200 km on highway | 1310 km on highway | ||
920 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.32 m | 4.28 m | |
Width: | 1.69 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.80 m | 1.64 m | |
Opel Combo is 4 cm longer than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Combo is 16 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Opel Combo is 0.3 metres less than that of the Citroen Xsara Picasso. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`815 | 1`300 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | 2000 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Opel Combo has
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
| |