Opel Combo 2012 vs Renault Kangoo 2013
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 HP | 110 HP | |
Torque: | 290 NM | 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
Renault Kangoo is a more dynamic driving. Opel Combo engine produces 20 HP less power than Renault Kangoo, but torque is 50 NM more than Renault Kangoo. Due to the lower power, Opel Combo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 4.4 | |
The Renault Kangoo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Combo consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kangoo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Combo could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 1360 km in combined cycle | |
1150 km on highway | 1420 km on highway | ||
Renault Kangoo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Renault Kangoo 2013 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Kangoo 2013 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.74 m | 4.28 m | |
Width: | 1.83 m | 1.83 m | |
Height: | 1.88 m | 1.80 m | |
Opel Combo is larger. Opel Combo is 46 cm longer than the Renault Kangoo, width is practically the same , while the height of Opel Combo is 8 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 790 litres | 660 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3200 litres | 2600 litres | |
Opel Combo has more luggage capacity. Opel Combo has 130 litres more trunk space than the Renault Kangoo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Combo (by 600 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Opel Combo is 0.5 metres more than that of the Renault Kangoo, which means Opel Combo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`030 | 1`980 | |
Safety: | |||
Renault Kangoo is better rated in child safety tests. The Renault Kangoo scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | no data | low | |
Average price (€): | 4600 | 9400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Opel Combo has
|
Renault Kangoo has
| |