Opel Combo 2012 vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2013

 
Opel Combo
2012 - 2017
Citroen C4 Picasso
2013 -
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Diesel1.6 Diesel

Performance

Power: 90 HP112 HP
Torque: 290 NM270 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14.9 seconds11.8 seconds
Citroen C4 Picasso is a more dynamic driving.
Opel Combo engine produces 22 HP less power than Citroen C4 Picasso, but torque is 20 NM more than Citroen C4 Picasso. Due to the lower power, Opel Combo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.64.0
Real fuel consumption: 5.8 l/100km5.8 l/100km
The Citroen C4 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Opel Combo consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Combo could require 240 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1070 km in combined cycle1370 km in combined cycle
1150 km on highway1440 km on highway
1030 km with real consumption940 km with real consumption
Citroen C4 Picasso 2013 1.6 engine: This diesel engine is known for its high reliability and impressive lifespan, combined with excellent fuel efficiency for its power output. It features hydraulic lifters in the cylinder head and uses a Common ...  More about Citroen C4 Picasso 2013 1.6 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.74 m4.44 m
Width: 1.83 m1.83 m
Height: 1.88 m1.61 m
Opel Combo is larger.
Opel Combo is 30 cm longer than the Citroen C4 Picasso, width is practically the same , while the height of Opel Combo is 27 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 790 litres537 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
3200 litresno data
Opel Combo has more luggage capacity.
Opel Combo has 253 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C4 Picasso.
Turning diameter: 11.2 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Combo is 0.4 metres more than that of the Citroen C4 Picasso.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0301`940
Safety:
Citroen C4 Picasso scores higher in safety tests. The Citroen C4 Picasso scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 460010 800
Pros and Cons: Opel Combo has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Citroen C4 Picasso has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher safety
  • better safety assist technologies
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv