Opel Combo 2012 vs Chevrolet Orlando 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 290 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Orlando is a more dynamic driving. Opel Combo engine produces 73 HP less power than Chevrolet Orlando, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Chevrolet Orlando. Due to the lower power, Opel Combo reaches 100 km/h speed 4.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Combo is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Opel Combo consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Orlando, which means that by driving the Opel Combo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Combo consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Orlando. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 1060 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
| 1030 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.74 m | 4.65 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.88 m | 1.63 m | |
| Opel Combo is 9 cm longer than the Chevrolet Orlando, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Combo is 25 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 790 litres | 458 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 458 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 790 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3200 litres | 458 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Combo (by 2742 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Combo is 0.1 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Orlando. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`030 | 2`287 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Combo has
|
Chevrolet Orlando has
| |