Opel Combo 2012 vs Toyota Verso 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 126 HP | |
| Torque: | 290 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.4 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Toyota Verso is a more dynamic driving. Opel Combo engine produces 21 HP less power than Toyota Verso, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Toyota Verso. Due to the lower power, Opel Combo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Verso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Combo consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Verso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Combo could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Combo consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Verso. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1240 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 370'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Fiat Bravo | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota RAV4, Toyota Auris | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Verso might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Verso 2013 2.0 engine: The 2.0-liter Toyota 1AD-FTV diesel engine, also known as the 2.0 D-4D, was produced from 2005 to 2018. In 2009, with the shift to Euro 5 emission standards, the engine was updated with piezo injectors replacing the earlier electromagnetic ones. It features an IHI RHF4 ... More about Toyota Verso 2013 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.46 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.62 m | |
| Opel Combo is 7 cm shorter than the Toyota Verso, 4 cm wider, while the height of Opel Combo is 23 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 790 litres | 484 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3200 litres | 1740 litres | |
|
Opel Combo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Opel Combo has 306 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Verso. The Toyota Verso may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Combo (by 1460 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Combo is 0.4 metres less than that of the Toyota Verso, which means Opel Combo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`010 | 2`260 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Combo has
|
Toyota Verso has
| |