Opel Combo 2012 vs Renault Scenic 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 290 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.4 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
|
Renault Scenic is a more dynamic driving. Opel Combo engine produces 5 HP less power than Renault Scenic, but torque is 30 NM more than Renault Scenic. Due to the lower power, Opel Combo reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 4.0 | |
|
The Renault Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Combo consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Combo could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 1300 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1330 km on highway | ||
| Renault Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Fiat Bravo | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Scenic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Opel Combo engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Renault Scenic 2016 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Renault Scenic 2016 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Opel Combo is smaller, but higher. Opel Combo is 2 cm shorter than the Renault Scenic, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Combo is 19 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 790 litres | 572 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3200 litres | 1554 litres | |
|
Opel Combo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Opel Combo has 218 litres more trunk space than the Renault Scenic. The Renault Scenic may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Combo (by 1646 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`010 | 2`097 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 12 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Combo has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |