Opel Combo 2012 vs Renault Grand Scenic 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 290 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.4 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
|
Renault Grand Scenic is a more dynamic driving. Opel Combo engine produces 5 HP less power than Renault Grand Scenic, but torque is 30 NM more than Renault Grand Scenic. Due to the lower power, Opel Combo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 4.1 | |
|
The Renault Grand Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Combo consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Grand Scenic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Combo could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 1460 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1530 km on highway | ||
| Renault Grand Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Fiat Bravo | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Grand Scenic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Opel Combo engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Renault Grand Scenic 2012 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Grand Scenic 2012 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Opel Combo is smaller, but higher. Opel Combo is 18 cm shorter than the Renault Grand Scenic, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Combo is 20 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 790 litres | 645 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 645 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 790 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3200 litres | 2063 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Combo (by 1137 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Combo is 0.1 metres less than that of the Renault Grand Scenic. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`010 | 2`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Renault Grand Scenic has
| |