Opel Combo 2012 vs Mazda 5 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 290 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.4 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
|
Opel Combo is more dynamic to drive. Opel Combo engine produces 10 HP less power than Mazda 5, but torque is 20 NM more than Mazda 5. Despite less power, Opel Combo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 5.2 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 370'000 km | 470'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 5 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Fiat Bravo | Used also on Mazda 3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.62 m | |
| Opel Combo is 20 cm shorter than the Mazda 5, 8 cm wider, while the height of Opel Combo is 23 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 790 litres | 112 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 112 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 790 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3200 litres | 1485 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Combo (by 1715 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Combo is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mazda 5, which means Opel Combo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`010 | 2`125 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Combo has
|
Mazda 5 has
| |