Opel Combo 2012 vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 290 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.4 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso is a more dynamic driving. Opel Combo engine produces 7 HP less power than Citroen C4 Picasso, but torque is 20 NM more than Citroen C4 Picasso. Due to the lower power, Opel Combo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 4.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C4 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Combo consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Combo could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Combo consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 1370 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1440 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C4 Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Fiat Bravo | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C5, Peugeot 207, Citroen C4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C4 Picasso might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Citroen C4 Picasso 2013 1.6 engine: This diesel engine is known for its high reliability and impressive lifespan, combined with excellent fuel efficiency for its power output. It features hydraulic lifters in the cylinder head and uses a Common ... More about Citroen C4 Picasso 2013 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.61 m | |
| Opel Combo is 5 cm shorter than the Citroen C4 Picasso, width is practically the same , while the height of Opel Combo is 24 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 790 litres | 537 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3200 litres | no data | |
|
Opel Combo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Opel Combo has 253 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C4 Picasso. The Citroen C4 Picasso may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Combo is 0.4 metres more than that of the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`010 | 1`940 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Citroen C4 Picasso scores higher in safety tests. The Citroen C4 Picasso scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Combo has
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has
| |