Opel Combo 2018 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan is a more dynamic driving. Opel Combo engine produces 38 HP less power than Volkswagen Sharan, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Volkswagen Sharan. Due to the lower power, Opel Combo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 70 litres | |
| 860 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 400'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Opel Corsa, Peugeot 308, Peugeot 2008, Citroen Berlingo | Installed on at least 12 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Audi A3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Sharan might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Volkswagen Sharan 2010 2.0 engine: The engine is very durable and can last a long time with proper maintenance, and is also quite economical for its power. There may be some problems with the turbine geometry. It is important to use good ... More about Volkswagen Sharan 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Opel Combo is smaller, but higher. Opel Combo is 45 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Sharan, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Combo is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 597 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 300 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 597 litres | 885 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2126 litres | 2297 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Volkswagen Sharan has more luggage space (by 288 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Sharan (by 171 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`340 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Combo has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |