Opel Combo 2018 vs Renault Kangoo 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 86 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 13.3 seconds | |
|
Opel Combo is more dynamic to drive. Opel Combo engine produces 44 HP more power than Renault Kangoo, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Renault Kangoo. Thanks to more power Opel Combo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 4.6 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| 810 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Citroen Berlingo, Opel Grandland | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Kangoo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Opel Combo engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Renault Kangoo 2013 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Kangoo 2013 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Opel Combo is larger. Opel Combo is 19 cm longer than the Renault Kangoo, 2 cm wider, while the height of Opel Combo is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 597 litres | 660 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2126 litres | 2600 litres | |
|
Renault Kangoo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Opel Combo has 63 litres less trunk space than the Renault Kangoo. This could mean that the Opel Combo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Kangoo (by 474 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`954 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 15 800 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Combo has
|
Renault Kangoo has
| |