Opel Combo 2004 vs Ford Tourneo 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.7 (petrol, diesel) | 1.8 (diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 70 - 101 HP | 90 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 125 - 240 NM | 220 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 - 17 seconds | 12.5 - 15.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 - 7.5 | 6.0 - 6.4 | |
|
On average, Opel Combo equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Tourneo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.91 m | |
|
Opel Combo is smaller. Opel Combo is 13 cm shorter than the Ford Tourneo, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Combo is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 610 litres | |
|
Ford Tourneo has more luggage space. Opel Combo has 155 litres less trunk space than the Ford Tourneo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Combo is 0.7 metres less than that of the Ford Tourneo, which means Opel Combo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`858 | ~ 2`220 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Combo has
|
Ford Tourneo has
| |