Opel Combo 2004 vs Citroen Berlingo 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.7 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 70 - 101 HP | 71 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 125 - 240 NM | 120 - 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 - 17 seconds | 11.2 - 20.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 - 7.5 | 5.4 - 7.4 | |
|
Opel Combo petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Citroen Berlingo. On average, Opel Combo equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Berlingo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.81 m | |
| Opel Combo is 18 cm longer than the Citroen Berlingo, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Combo is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 624 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2800 litres | |
|
Citroen Berlingo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Opel Combo has 169 litres less trunk space than the Citroen Berlingo. This could mean that the Opel Combo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Combo is 0.1 metres less than that of the Citroen Berlingo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`858 | ~ 1`862 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Combo has
|
Citroen Berlingo has
| |