Opel Combo 2012 vs Volkswagen Caddy 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 - 135 HP | 69 - 109 HP | |
Torque: | 127 - 320 NM | 126 - 250 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 - 15.4 seconds | 13.3 - 20.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 - 7.4 | 6.0 - 8.3 | |
Opel Combo petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Caddy. On average, Opel Combo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Caddy. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.57 m | 4.40 m | |
Width: | 1.83 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.86 m | 1.83 m | |
Opel Combo is larger. Opel Combo is 17 cm longer than the Volkswagen Caddy, 3 cm wider, while the height of Opel Combo is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 790 litres | 560 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3200 litres | 2239 litres | |
Opel Combo has more luggage capacity. Opel Combo has 230 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Caddy. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Combo (by 961 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.3 meters | |
The turning circle of the Opel Combo is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Caddy. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`008 | ~ 2`024 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 5800 | 3000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Opel Combo has
|
Volkswagen Caddy has
| |