Opel Antara 2007 vs Honda CR-V 2004
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 140 HP | |
Torque: | 320 NM | 340 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
Opel Antara is more dynamic to drive. Opel Antara engine produces 10 HP more power than Honda CR-V, but torque is 20 NM less than Honda CR-V. Thanks to more power Opel Antara reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 6.7 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 9.0 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Antara consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Antara could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Antara consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 58 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
950 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
720 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 530'000 km | 350'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Antara engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 5 years | 8 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chevrolet Captiva, Chevrolet Epica, Chevrolet Cruze | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Honda CR-V might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Opel Antara engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Honda CR-V 2004 2.2 engine: Honda’s first diesel engine featured an aluminum block, a variable-geometry turbocharger, second-generation Bosch Common Rail injection, 16-valve cylinder head, and a balance shaft integrated into the crankcase. The ... More about Honda CR-V 2004 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.58 m | 4.64 m | |
Width: | 1.85 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
Opel Antara is 6 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 7 cm wider, while the height of Opel Antara is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 525 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1420 litres | 952 litres | |
Opel Antara has 155 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Antara (by 468 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Opel Antara is 1.8 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Opel Antara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`225 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | Opel Antara has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda CR-V has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Opel Antara, so Opel Antara quality is probably significantly better | ||
Average price (€): | 4400 | 2600 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 8.4/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Opel Antara has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |