Opel Antara 2007 vs Peugeot 4007 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 4007 is a more dynamic driving. Opel Antara engine produces 6 HP less power than Peugeot 4007, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Peugeot 4007. Due to the lower power, Opel Antara reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.0 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 4007 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Antara consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 4007, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Antara could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Antara consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 4007. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 530'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Antara engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chevrolet Captiva, Chevrolet Epica, Chevrolet Cruze | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Citroen C-Crosser | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Opel Antara might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.67 m | |
| Opel Antara is 6 cm shorter than the Peugeot 4007, 5 cm wider, while the height of Opel Antara is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1420 litres | 1686 litres | |
|
Peugeot 4007 has more luggage space. Opel Antara has 140 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 4007. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 4007 (by 266 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Antara is 0.4 metres more than that of the Peugeot 4007, which means Opel Antara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`225 | 2`410 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Antara has
|
Peugeot 4007 has
| |