Opel Antara 2007 vs Nissan X-Trail 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Opel Antara and Nissan X-Trail have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Opel Antara reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.0 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Antara consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Antara could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Antara consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chevrolet Captiva, Chevrolet Epica, Chevrolet Cruze | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2007 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
| Opel Antara is 5 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 7 cm wider, while the height of Opel Antara is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 479 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1420 litres | 1742 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Opel Antara has 109 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 322 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Antara is 1.6 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Opel Antara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`225 | 2`170 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Opel Antara has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Nissan X-Trail, so Opel Antara quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 4600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 8.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Antara has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |