Opel Antara 2011 vs Toyota RAV4 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 167 HP | 146 HP | |
| Torque: | 217 NM | 187 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Opel Antara is more dynamic to drive. Opel Antara engine produces 21 HP more power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Toyota RAV4. Thanks to more power Opel Antara reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 7.8 | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Antara consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Antara could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Toyota RAV4 2012: It has proactive automatic four-wheel drive with Auto, Lock and Sport modes. In Auto mode, the car has front-wheel drive under normal conditions. If wheel slip is detected, torque is transferred to the rear wheels via an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch. In Sport mode, torque is transferred almost instantaneously between the front and rear wheels to improve cornering performance, with up to 50 percent of engine power going to the rear wheels. Lock mode can be activated at speeds below 40 km/h and provides constant four-wheel drive. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Antara engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chevrolet Captiva, Chevrolet Malibu | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Camry | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota RAV4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota RAV4 2013 2.0 engine: Owners often report increasing oil consumption, which becomes particularly pronounced over time. Additionally, the water pump has a limited service life, and after 150,000 km, the timing chain tends to ... More about Toyota RAV4 2013 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Opel Antara is larger. Opel Antara is 3 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, width is practically the same , while the height of Opel Antara is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 402 litres | 577 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1391 litres | 1705 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Opel Antara has 175 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. This could mean that the Opel Antara uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 314 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`183 | 2`110 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 11 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Antara has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |