Opel Antara 2011 vs Jeep Cherokee 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 167 HP | 271 HP | |
| Torque: | 217 NM | 315 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Opel Antara engine produces 104 HP less power than Jeep Cherokee, whereas torque is 98 NM less than Jeep Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Opel Antara reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 10.0 | |
|
The Opel Antara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Antara consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that by driving the Opel Antara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Opel Antara is smaller, but higher. Opel Antara is 3 cm shorter than the Jeep Cherokee, width is practically the same , while the height of Opel Antara is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 402 litres | 412 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1391 litres | no data | |
| Opel Antara has 10 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Antara is 0.7 metres more than that of the Jeep Cherokee, which means Opel Antara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`183 | 2`435 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 13 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Antara has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |