Opel Antara 2011 vs Jeep Cherokee 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 167 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 217 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Opel Antara engine produces 3 HP less power than Jeep Cherokee, whereas torque is 133 NM less than Jeep Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Opel Antara reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 5.8 | |
|
The Jeep Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Antara consumes 3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Antara could require 450 litres more fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chevrolet Captiva, Chevrolet Malibu | Used also on Jeep Renegade | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Opel Antara might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Opel Antara engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Opel Antara is smaller, but higher. Opel Antara is 3 cm shorter than the Jeep Cherokee, width is practically the same , while the height of Opel Antara is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 402 litres | 412 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1391 litres | no data | |
| Opel Antara has 10 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Antara is 0.7 metres more than that of the Jeep Cherokee, which means Opel Antara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`183 | 2`475 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7800 | 13 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Antara has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |