Opel Antara 2011 vs Honda CR-V 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 167 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 217 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
|
Opel Antara is more dynamic to drive. Opel Antara engine produces 17 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 27 NM more than Honda CR-V. Thanks to more power Opel Antara reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 7.9 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Antara consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Antara could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2015: Vehicle features automatic four-wheel drive system that sends torque to front wheels under typical conditions. Electronically controlled multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear wheels when slipping is detected. The all-wheel drive system constantly communicates with the VSA dynamic stabilization system and the electric power steering to maintain full control of the vehicle, good traction and maneuverability in any road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chevrolet Captiva, Chevrolet Malibu | Used also on Honda Accord | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Opel Antara engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Honda CR-V 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is sensitive to both fuel and oil quality. Using low-grade gasoline can quickly damage the catalytic converter and lead to premature failure of the oxygen sensors.
Many Honda owners are annoyed ... More about Honda CR-V 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.69 m | |
| Opel Antara and Honda CR-V are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 402 litres | 589 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1391 litres | 1669 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Opel Antara has 187 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 278 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Antara is 0.6 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Opel Antara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`183 | 2`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 7800 | 14 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Antara has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |