Opel Antara 2011 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 167 HP | 147 HP | |
| Torque: | 217 NM | 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Opel Antara is more dynamic to drive. Opel Antara engine produces 20 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 22 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Thanks to more power Opel Antara reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 7.5 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Antara consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Antara could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Outlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chevrolet Captiva, Chevrolet Malibu | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi ASX, Peugeot 4008 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Outlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Opel Antara engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.68 m | |
| Opel Antara is 6 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 5 cm wider, while the height of Opel Antara is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 402 litres | 591 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1391 litres | no data | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage space. Opel Antara has 189 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Antara is 1.7 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Opel Antara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`183 | 1`985 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Antara has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |