Opel Antara 2011 vs Toyota RAV4 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
| Opel Antara engine produces 13 HP more power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Toyota RAV4. Despite the higher power, Opel Antara reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Antara consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Antara could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Antara consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Toyota RAV4 2012: It has proactive automatic four-wheel drive with Auto, Lock and Sport modes. In Auto mode, the car has front-wheel drive under normal conditions. If wheel slip is detected, torque is transferred to the rear wheels via an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch. In Sport mode, torque is transferred almost instantaneously between the front and rear wheels to improve cornering performance, with up to 50 percent of engine power going to the rear wheels. Lock mode can be activated at speeds below 40 km/h and provides constant four-wheel drive. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Chevrolet Captiva | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla Verso, Toyota Verso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota RAV4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota RAV4 2012 2.2 engine: The AD-series turbo diesel engines were introduced in Toyota vehicles in 2005 and remained in production until 2018. The first model was a 2.2-liter engine, followed by a 2.0-liter version. Both engines share an 86 mm ... More about Toyota RAV4 2012 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Opel Antara is larger. Opel Antara is 3 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, width is practically the same , while the height of Opel Antara is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 419 litres | 577 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1705 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Opel Antara has 158 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. This could mean that the Opel Antara uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Antara is 1.7 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Opel Antara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`220 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 7800 | 12 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Antara has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |