Opel Antara 2011 vs Honda CR-V 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
| Opel Antara engine produces 13 HP more power than Honda CR-V, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite the higher power, Opel Antara reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 6.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Antara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Antara consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Opel Antara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Opel Antara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2012: Vehicle has automatic four-wheel drive system that sends torque to front wheels under normal conditions. Electronically controlled multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear axle when wheel slip is detected. The all-wheel drive system constantly interacts with the VSA dynamic stabilization system and electric power steering to provide full vehicle control, good traction and maneuverability in all road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Antara engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Chevrolet Captiva | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Opel Antara engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Opel Antara is larger. Opel Antara is 3 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 3 cm wider, while the height of Opel Antara is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 419 litres | 589 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1669 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Opel Antara has 170 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. This could mean that the Opel Antara uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Antara is 0.5 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Opel Antara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Antara has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |