Opel Antara 2011 vs Nissan X-Trail 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Opel Antara is more dynamic to drive. Opel Antara engine produces 13 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Opel Antara reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
By specification Opel Antara consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that by driving the Opel Antara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Opel Antara consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Chevrolet Captiva | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2010 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.70 m | |
| Opel Antara is 4 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 6 cm wider, while the height of Opel Antara is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 419 litres | 479 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Opel Antara has 60 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Antara is 1.5 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Opel Antara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`170 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Antara has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |