Opel Antara 2011 vs Nissan X-Trail 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Opel Antara is more dynamic to drive. Opel Antara engine produces 33 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Opel Antara reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Antara consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Antara could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Antara consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Chevrolet Captiva | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.71 m | |
| Opel Antara is 4 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 3 cm wider, while the height of Opel Antara is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 419 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1877 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Opel Antara has 131 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Antara is 1.1 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Opel Antara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`310 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 13 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Antara has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |