Opel Antara 2011 vs Mazda CX-5 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is a more dynamic driving. Opel Antara engine produces 13 HP more power than Mazda CX-5, but torque is 30 NM less than Mazda CX-5. Despite the higher power, Opel Antara reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 4.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda CX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Antara consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Antara could require 255 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Antara consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 56 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 1210 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Chevrolet Captiva | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda CX-7 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Opel Antara engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Opel Antara is larger. Opel Antara is 6 cm longer than the Mazda CX-5, 1 cm wider, while the height of Opel Antara is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 419 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1620 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Opel Antara has 86 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. This could mean that the Opel Antara uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Antara is 1.1 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-5, which means Opel Antara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`035 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Antara has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |