Opel Antara 2011 vs Mazda CX-5 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is a more dynamic driving. Opel Antara engine produces 12 HP less power than Mazda CX-5, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Mazda CX-5. Due to the lower power, Opel Antara reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda CX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Antara consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Antara could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Mazda CX-5 2015: Engine power is automatically (without driver intervention) distributed among the wheels based on conditions using a hydraulic multi-disc clutch, viscous clutch, or similar traction control device. Some systems allow locking of multi-disc clutch manually for permanent all wheel drive. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Antara engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Chevrolet Captiva | Used also on Mazda 6 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Opel Antara might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Opel Antara is larger. Opel Antara is 4 cm longer than the Mazda CX-5, 1 cm wider, while the height of Opel Antara is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 419 litres | 503 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1620 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Opel Antara has 84 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. This could mean that the Opel Antara uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Antara is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-5, which means Opel Antara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`140 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 10 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Antara has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |