Opel Antara 2011 vs Citroen C-Crosser 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Opel Antara engine produces 7 HP more power than Citroen C-Crosser, but torque is 30 NM less than Citroen C-Crosser. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Antara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Antara consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C-Crosser, which means that by driving the Opel Antara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Antara consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C-Crosser. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Opel Antara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Citroen C-Crosser engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Chevrolet Captiva | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Peugeot 4007 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.65 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.67 m | |
| Opel Antara is 5 cm shorter than the Citroen C-Crosser, 4 cm wider, while the height of Opel Antara is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 419 litres | 184 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 184 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 419 litres | 441 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1686 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Citroen C-Crosser has more luggage space (by 22 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Antara is 0.3 metres more than that of the Citroen C-Crosser. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`410 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7800 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Antara has
|
Citroen C-Crosser has
| |