Opel Antara 2011 vs BMW X3 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
BMW X3 is a more dynamic driving. Opel Antara engine produces 21 HP less power than BMW X3, whereas torque is 30 NM less than BMW X3. Due to the lower power, Opel Antara reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Antara consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Antara could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Antara consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 1190 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Antara engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Chevrolet Captiva | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X1 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X3 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW X3 2010 2.0 engine: Because of problems with the timing chain, which tends to stretch at 100,000 km, the BMW N47 engine is sometimes called the worst BMW engine. Replacing the timing chain also requires removing the engine from ... More about BMW X3 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.65 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Opel Antara is smaller, but higher. Opel Antara is 5 cm shorter than the BMW X3, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Antara is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 419 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1600 litres | |
|
BMW X3 has more luggage space. Opel Antara has 131 litres less trunk space than the BMW X3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Antara is 0.6 metres more than that of the BMW X3, which means Opel Antara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`290 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 7800 | 12 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Antara has
|
BMW X3 has
| |