Opel Antara 2011 vs BMW X3 2006

 
Opel Antara
2011 - 2013
BMW X3
2006 - 2010
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 2.2 Diesel3.0 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 163 HP286 HP
Torque: 350 NM580 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.9 seconds6.6 seconds
BMW X3 is a more dynamic driving.
Opel Antara engine produces 123 HP less power than BMW X3, whereas torque is 230 NM less than BMW X3. Due to the lower power, Opel Antara reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.37.8
Real fuel consumption: 7.5 l/100km9.8 l/100km
The Opel Antara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Opel Antara consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3, which means that by driving the Opel Antara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Antara consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3.
Fuel tank capacity: 65 litres67 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1030 km in combined cycle850 km in combined cycle
1250 km on highway1000 km on highway
860 km with real consumption680 km with real consumption
Opel Antara gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 14 years12 years
Engine spread: Used also on Chevrolet CaptivaInstalled on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X6
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X3 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.60 m4.57 m
Width: 1.85 m1.85 m
Height: 1.76 m1.67 m
Opel Antara is 3 cm longer than the BMW X3, width is practically the same , while the height of Opel Antara is 9 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 419 litres480 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1560 litres
BMW X3 has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Opel Antara has 61 litres less trunk space than the BMW X3. This could mean that the Opel Antara uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 12.3 meters12 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Antara is 0.3 metres more than that of the BMW X3.
Gross weight (kg): 2`5052`385
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

average
Average price (€): 82006800
Pros and Cons: Opel Antara has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
BMW X3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv