Opel Antara 2011 vs BMW X3 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 7.7 seconds | |
|
BMW X3 is a more dynamic driving. Opel Antara engine produces 55 HP less power than BMW X3, whereas torque is 150 NM less than BMW X3. Due to the lower power, Opel Antara reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Antara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Antara consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3, which means that by driving the Opel Antara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Antara consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Opel Antara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a BMW X3 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 3 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Chevrolet Captiva | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW X5 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| BMW X3 2006 3.0 engine: The BMW M57 engine is regarded as one of the best German-built power units. Its inline-six layout is praised for reliability, and cars equipped with this engine are often more desirable on the used market. Despite delivering ... More about BMW X3 2006 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.67 m | |
| Opel Antara is 3 cm longer than the BMW X3, width is practically the same , while the height of Opel Antara is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 419 litres | 480 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1560 litres | |
|
BMW X3 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Opel Antara has 61 litres less trunk space than the BMW X3. This could mean that the Opel Antara uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Antara is 0.3 metres more than that of the BMW X3. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`355 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Antara has
|
BMW X3 has
| |