Opel Antara 2010 vs Ford Kuga 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Opel Antara is more dynamic to drive. Opel Antara engine produces 21 HP more power than Ford Kuga, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Ford Kuga. Thanks to more power Opel Antara reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Kuga is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Antara consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Antara could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Antara consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1160 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Opel Antara is larger. Opel Antara is 7 cm longer than the Ford Kuga, 1 cm wider, while the height of Opel Antara is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 402 litres | 456 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1391 litres | 1568 litres | |
|
Ford Kuga has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Opel Antara has 54 litres less trunk space than the Ford Kuga. This could mean that the Opel Antara uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Kuga (by 177 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Antara is 1.3 metres more than that of the Ford Kuga, which means Opel Antara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`250 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 12 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Antara has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |