Opel Antara 2006 vs Honda CR-V 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Opel Antara is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Honda CR-V can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Honda CR-V also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.2 | 2.0 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 - 227 HP | 140 - 166 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 - 320 NM | 192 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 12.1 seconds | 10.2 - 12.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 - 11.6 | 6.5 - 9.5 | |
|
Opel Antara petrol engines consumes on average 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V. On average, Opel Antara equipped with diesel engines consume 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Opel Antara is 6 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 3 cm wider, while the height of Opel Antara is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1420 litres | 1532 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Opel Antara uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 112 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Antara is 0.6 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Opel Antara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`410 kg | ~ 2`098 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`835 kg | ~ 1`556 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 575 kg | ~ 542 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 4200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Antara has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |