Opel Antara 2006 vs Ford Kuga 2008

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Opel Antara
2006 - 2011
Ford Kuga
2008 - 2013
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Opel Antara is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Ford Kuga can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Ford Kuga also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 2.0 - 3.22.0 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 140 - 227 HP136 - 200 HP
Torque: 220 - 320 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.8 - 12.1 seconds8.2 - 10.7 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.5 - 11.65.3 - 10.3
Opel Antara petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Kuga. On average, Opel Antara equipped with diesel engines consume 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.58 m4.44 m
Width: 1.85 m1.84 m
Height: 1.70 m1.68 m
Opel Antara is larger.
Opel Antara is 14 cm longer than the Ford Kuga, width is practically the same , while the height of Opel Antara is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 370 litres410 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1420 litresno data
Ford Kuga has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Opel Antara has 40 litres less trunk space than the Ford Kuga. This could mean that the Opel Antara uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 12.4 meters11.6 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Antara is 0.8 metres more than that of the Ford Kuga, which means Opel Antara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`410~ 2`130
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

above average
Average price (€): 50007200
Rating in user reviews: 7.4/10 8.8/10
Pros and Cons: Opel Antara has
  • lower price
Ford Kuga has
  • also available in 2WD
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv